RSS | Archive | Random

About

Radically Pro-Choice!

Rabble aims to be as communal as possible.

If you have something you'd like to see on Rabble send it to: prochoicerabble@live.co.uk As long as you do not promote an anti-choice agenda Rabble will post it. Your name will be kept secret unless otherwise indicated.

Rabble has a Formspring! http://www.formspring.com/forms/?778964-MGKiwv4d8Q

Contact Rabble via the askbox! rabbleprochoice.tumblr.com/ask

tumblr visit counter

Following

8 April 12
feministblackboard:

A few weeks ago my mom stapled pages of a story in one of her women’s magazines together and handed it to me. She gave it to me pretty much with the tag lines “for your feminist blog” and “something new to consider.” Indeed it was; she knows me well.
The story is titled “I was forced to be pregnant.” With a title like that, reading it was actually not on the top of my to read list. I thought it was about women not exercising their right to choice. I was very, very wrong on that one.
Have you ever heard of Reproductive coercion? It is a term that was quite recently coined by the advocates against domestic violence to describe a certain type of abuse some women face. It occurs when a man pressures their partner to have kids and/or impregnates them against their will. Reproductive coercion comes in three different types:1. Emotional pressure that turns into verbal and physical abuse.2. Sabotaging birth control3. Marital rapeOver 75% of women 19-49 who reported once experiencing domestic violence also endured some type of reproductive control by men. It’s all about control and domination over a woman’s body.
The first story in the magazine is about a woman who got married around 36 years of age. After a few months of dating her boyfriend talked excitedly about having children. After he proposed he began calling her “The Babymaker.” She then confided with him that one of her fallopian tubes was blocked. He in return insisted she see a fertility doctor. She recounts, “I had finally met a great guy who was eager to start a family with me. What woman wouldn’t fall for that?” Soon after her honeymoon he persisted on in an obsessive manner, but his efforts had to be temporarily halted as she had to get emergency back surgery. Alas, 6 months into recovery he was back to pressuring her again. She was in much pain at the time due to her back, but she agreed to In Vitro Fertilization. She then became pregnant, but soon miscarried. In response, her husband grabbed her by the neck, choking her. He apologized, blaming his outburst on his grief and had her sign up for another round of IVF. And then a third round. She tried to put him off with the excuse that she needed to weigh more before she could take treatments, her husband forced her to get on the scale often and filled the fridge with fattening foods. “It hurt that all I was good for was getting pregnant.” She recounts. At the end, he screamed at her, threatening to replace her with a maid if she couldn’t get pregnant and she told him she no longer wanted to have his child. He destroyed bedroom furniture, pushed her down the stairs and threatened her with a gun. She fled to a domestic violence shelter.
The second story was about a woman who faced marital rape. This woman was 40, had a then boyfriend and two children from a previous marriage. After telling her boyfriend she did not want any more children, her boyfriend refused to wear a condom and began to rape her.  She then became pregnant with her third child. Birth control was never an option for her because she couldn’t hide pills anywhere for he went through all of her belongings. Three months after giving birth, he raped her again, impregnating her with twins. She lost the twins in a physical fight with him, but soon became pregnant again. During her recovery she begged her obstetrician to remove her ovaries and devise a lie to tell him; that she had cancer. After a decade of sexual abuse and violence she was able to get a job that kept her out of the house and often times traveling.
One in four callers to the National Domestic Abuse hotline said that their partners had tried to force them to become pregnant. Why? As one woman stated, “Its like he wants to own me from the inside out.”  Having a baby is the perfect tie that binds. These type of abusers want to create a circumstance in which their partner is dependent on him.
WHAT’S THAT HAVE TO DO WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD?
Many voters never consider how defunding these clinics could hurt victims of domestic violence who turn to them for counseling as well as pregnancy prevention. Abused women will turn to health care providers long before they will turn to domestic abuse hotlines and organizations. Many women in abusive relationships rely on life saving, affordable care programs such as Title X. It is critical that such places are open and operation when women and children need them so desperately.

feministblackboard:

A few weeks ago my mom stapled pages of a story in one of her women’s magazines together and handed it to me. She gave it to me pretty much with the tag lines “for your feminist blog” and “something new to consider.” Indeed it was; she knows me well.

The story is titled “I was forced to be pregnant.” With a title like that, reading it was actually not on the top of my to read list. I thought it was about women not exercising their right to choice. I was very, very wrong on that one.

Have you ever heard of Reproductive coercion? It is a term that was quite recently coined by the advocates against domestic violence to describe a certain type of abuse some women face. It occurs when a man pressures their partner to have kids and/or impregnates them against their will. Reproductive coercion comes in three different types:
1. Emotional pressure that turns into verbal and physical abuse.
2. Sabotaging birth control
3. Marital rape
Over 75% of women 19-49 who reported once experiencing domestic violence also endured some type of reproductive control by men. It’s all about control and domination over a woman’s body.

The first story in the magazine is about a woman who got married around 36 years of age. After a few months of dating her boyfriend talked excitedly about having children. After he proposed he began calling her “The Babymaker.” She then confided with him that one of her fallopian tubes was blocked. He in return insisted she see a fertility doctor. She recounts, “I had finally met a great guy who was eager to start a family with me. What woman wouldn’t fall for that?” Soon after her honeymoon he persisted on in an obsessive manner, but his efforts had to be temporarily halted as she had to get emergency back surgery. Alas, 6 months into recovery he was back to pressuring her again. She was in much pain at the time due to her back, but she agreed to In Vitro Fertilization. She then became pregnant, but soon miscarried. In response, her husband grabbed her by the neck, choking her. He apologized, blaming his outburst on his grief and had her sign up for another round of IVF. And then a third round. She tried to put him off with the excuse that she needed to weigh more before she could take treatments, her husband forced her to get on the scale often and filled the fridge with fattening foods. “It hurt that all I was good for was getting pregnant.” She recounts. At the end, he screamed at her, threatening to replace her with a maid if she couldn’t get pregnant and she told him she no longer wanted to have his child. He destroyed bedroom furniture, pushed her down the stairs and threatened her with a gun. She fled to a domestic violence shelter.

The second story was about a woman who faced marital rape. This woman was 40, had a then boyfriend and two children from a previous marriage. After telling her boyfriend she did not want any more children, her boyfriend refused to wear a condom and began to rape her.  She then became pregnant with her third child. Birth control was never an option for her because she couldn’t hide pills anywhere for he went through all of her belongings. Three months after giving birth, he raped her again, impregnating her with twins. She lost the twins in a physical fight with him, but soon became pregnant again. During her recovery she begged her obstetrician to remove her ovaries and devise a lie to tell him; that she had cancer. After a decade of sexual abuse and violence she was able to get a job that kept her out of the house and often times traveling.

One in four callers to the National Domestic Abuse hotline said that their partners had tried to force them to become pregnant. Why? As one woman stated, “Its like he wants to own me from the inside out.”  Having a baby is the perfect tie that binds. These type of abusers want to create a circumstance in which their partner is dependent on him.

WHAT’S THAT HAVE TO DO WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD?

Many voters never consider how defunding these clinics could hurt victims of domestic violence who turn to them for counseling as well as pregnancy prevention. Abused women will turn to health care providers long before they will turn to domestic abuse hotlines and organizations. Many women in abusive relationships rely on life saving, affordable care programs such as Title X. It is critical that such places are open and operation when women and children need them so desperately.

Reblogged: fuckyeahplannedparenthood

4 January 12
turdsbytim:


Introducing the ABORTION AVENGER, a result of severe boredom. This curvy, preggo vigilante rips out the guts of menacing abortionists who threaten the lives of babies with a possible good future ahead of them. One of the babies Tiller the Killer eliminated? Could have been a lawyer. Possible comic book series ahead. I’ve got plenty of ideas on where to take this.




I’m sorry?
You are so pro-life that you are going to have a comic featuring the gruesome murder of physicians?
One of the pregnancies Dr. Tiller helped terminate safely could have been the next Ted Bundy or Hitler, too. In which case, he’d be a hero.
Thanks for playing. You’ve lost the game.
Love,
Rabble

turdsbytim:

Introducing the ABORTION AVENGER, a result of severe boredom. This curvy, preggo vigilante rips out the guts of menacing abortionists who threaten the lives of babies with a possible good future ahead of them. One of the babies Tiller the Killer eliminated? Could have been a lawyer. 

Possible comic book series ahead. I’ve got plenty of ideas on where to take this.

I’m sorry?

You are so pro-life that you are going to have a comic featuring the gruesome murder of physicians?

One of the pregnancies Dr. Tiller helped terminate safely could have been the next Ted Bundy or Hitler, too. In which case, he’d be a hero.

Thanks for playing. You’ve lost the game.

Love,

Rabble

Reblogged: turdsbytim

9 October 11
The holocaust killed six million jews. Abortion has killed fifty million + babies. Let’s call this what it is: genocide.

(via michaeletto)

No.

Genocide is the deliberate killing of a group of people based on race or ethnicity. 

People getting abortions aren’t terminating their pregnancies because of their own race. You didn’t even try to think about this, did you?

Abortion is exactly what it is. It is the termination of a pregnancy in which no persons recognized by the government as having rights are victims of it.

Genocide murders people because they are Jewish or of another ethnicity or have a disability. These people are victims of mass murders done with machine guns or death camps. They have rights, they have personhood, they have autonomy; none of which a fetus has.

There are no fetuses walking around being forced to trudge through snow with no shoes so they can be worked to death in a rock quarry. There are no fetuses being starved to death or having their gold fillings ripped out of their teeth and used to fund the very death camp they are in. There are no fetuses dying from typhus in Auschwitz who have had their diaries posthumously published.

Sit your ass down.

I am so sick of seeing white dudes with no semblance of what it is like to be pregnant spout this bullshit. It’s ironic that pro-lifers tend to be men because 84% of single parents are mothers. It’s easy to moan and bitch about how abortion is JUST LIKE the Holocaust (NO. IT ISN’T) when you’re part of the gender that doesn’t take responsibility for their fucking kids after they’re born. REAL EASY.

Love,

Rabble

(Source: trialandtriumph)

Reblogged: trialandtriumph

28 September 11
stfuconservatives:

rabbleprochoice:

stankdank:

A picture began circulating in November. It should be “The Picture of the Year,” or perhaps, “Picture of the Decade.” It won’t be. In fact, unless you obtained a copy of the U.S. paper which published it, you probably would never have seen it.The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother’s womb. Little Samuel’s mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner’s remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. As Dr. Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon’s finger. Dr. Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, “Hand of Hope.” The text explaining the picture begins, “The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother’s uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.”Little Samuel’s mother said they “wept for days” when they saw the picture. She said, “The photo reminds us pregnancy isn’t about disability or an illness, it’s about a little person” Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful. Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome…incredible….an d hey, pass it on! The world needs to see this one! 

At the bold, yeah no.
If you know even the basics of how a surgery is performed, you would know that the fetus reaching out and touching/grabbing the surgeon’s finger would be fucking impossible.
Do you think the mother of that fetus was awake during this surgery? NO.
She was put under anesthesia. Guess what happens when you put something in a pregnant person…IT ALSO GOES TO THE FETUS.
That’s why drinking alcohol or eating soft cheese or sushi is such a “no-no” for pregnant people. 
So, the mother was put under anesthesia and couldn’t move…HER FETUS COULDN’T EITHER. That is how pregnancy and anesthesia work.
Don’t take my word for it, though, take the actual surgeon’s:

The baby did not reach out. The baby was anesthetized. It was not aware of what was going on.

The surgeon never said that it was an emotional experience for him, the pro-life photographer who took said it. The surgeon pulled the hand out himself, as the fetus was fucking paralyzed at the time.
Here, I did your research for you:
Source #1 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Source #2 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Source #3 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Finding those took me, like, four minutes of Googling and skimming.
Love,
Rabble

Do pro-lifers EVER get tired of lying? IF YOUR CAUSE WAS REALLY THAT GREAT MAYBE YOU WOULDN’T NEED LIES AND EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION TO PERPETRATE IT.

^^^^^
Just saying.
While running this site, I have never had to lie or use pictures like that above to emotionally manipulate people for my cause because scientific evidence and analysis of my government’s major binding documents already support my cause.
U MAD PRO-LIFERS?

Love,
Rabble

stfuconservatives:

rabbleprochoice:

stankdank:

A picture began circulating in November. It should be “The Picture of the Year,” or perhaps, “Picture of the Decade.” It won’t be. In fact, unless you obtained a copy of the U.S. paper which published it, you probably would never have seen it.

The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother’s womb. Little Samuel’s mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner’s remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.

During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. As Dr. Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon’s finger. Dr. Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.

The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, “Hand of Hope.” The text explaining the picture begins, “The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother’s uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.”

Little Samuel’s mother said they “wept for days” when they saw the picture. She said, “The photo reminds us pregnancy isn’t about disability or an illness, it’s about a little person” Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful. Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome…incredible….an d hey, pass it on! The world needs to see this one! 

At the bold, yeah no.

If you know even the basics of how a surgery is performed, you would know that the fetus reaching out and touching/grabbing the surgeon’s finger would be fucking impossible.

Do you think the mother of that fetus was awake during this surgery? NO.

She was put under anesthesia. Guess what happens when you put something in a pregnant person…IT ALSO GOES TO THE FETUS.

That’s why drinking alcohol or eating soft cheese or sushi is such a “no-no” for pregnant people. 

So, the mother was put under anesthesia and couldn’t move…HER FETUS COULDN’T EITHER. That is how pregnancy and anesthesia work.

Don’t take my word for it, though, take the actual surgeon’s:

The baby did not reach out. The baby was anesthetized. It was not aware of what was going on.

The surgeon never said that it was an emotional experience for him, the pro-life photographer who took said it. The surgeon pulled the hand out himself, as the fetus was fucking paralyzed at the time.

Here, I did your research for you:

Source #1 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Source #2 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Source #3 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Finding those took me, like, four minutes of Googling and skimming.

Love,

Rabble

Do pro-lifers EVER get tired of lying? IF YOUR CAUSE WAS REALLY THAT GREAT MAYBE YOU WOULDN’T NEED LIES AND EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION TO PERPETRATE IT.

^^^^^

Just saying.

While running this site, I have never had to lie or use pictures like that above to emotionally manipulate people for my cause because scientific evidence and analysis of my government’s major binding documents already support my cause.

U MAD PRO-LIFERS?

Love,

Rabble

Reblogged: stfuconservatives

Posted: 3:40 PM
stankdank:

A picture began circulating in November. It should be “The Picture of the Year,” or perhaps, “Picture of the Decade.” It won’t be. In fact, unless you obtained a copy of the U.S. paper which published it, you probably would never have seen it.The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother’s womb. Little Samuel’s mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner’s remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. As Dr. Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon’s finger. Dr. Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, “Hand of Hope.” The text explaining the picture begins, “The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother’s uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.”Little Samuel’s mother said they “wept for days” when they saw the picture. She said, “The photo reminds us pregnancy isn’t about disability or an illness, it’s about a little person” Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful. Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome…incredible….and hey, pass it on! The world needs to see this one! 

At the bold, yeah no.
If you know even the basics of how a surgery is performed, you would know that the fetus reaching out and touching/grabbing the surgeon’s finger would be fucking impossible.
Do you think the mother of that fetus was awake during this surgery? NO.
She was put under anesthesia. Guess what happens when you put something in a pregnant person…IT ALSO GOES TO THE FETUS.
That’s why drinking alcohol or eating soft cheese or sushi is such a “no-no” for pregnant people. 
So, the mother was put under anesthesia and couldn’t move…HER FETUS COULDN’T EITHER. That is how pregnancy and anesthesia work.
Don’t take my word for it, though, take the actual surgeon’s:

The baby did not reach out. The baby was anesthetized. It was not aware of what was going on.

The surgeon never said that it was an emotional experience for him, the pro-life photographer who took said it. The surgeon pulled the hand out himself, as the fetus was fucking paralyzed at the time.
Here, I did your research for you:
Source #1 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Source #2 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Source #3 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.
Finding those took me, like, four minutes of Googling and skimming.
Love,
Rabble

stankdank:

A picture began circulating in November. It should be “The Picture of the Year,” or perhaps, “Picture of the Decade.” It won’t be. In fact, unless you obtained a copy of the U.S. paper which published it, you probably would never have seen it.

The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother’s womb. Little Samuel’s mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner’s remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.

During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. As Dr. Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon’s finger. Dr. Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.

The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, “Hand of Hope.” The text explaining the picture begins, “The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother’s uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.”

Little Samuel’s mother said they “wept for days” when they saw the picture. She said, “The photo reminds us pregnancy isn’t about disability or an illness, it’s about a little person” Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful. Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome…incredible….and hey, pass it on! The world needs to see this one! 

At the bold, yeah no.

If you know even the basics of how a surgery is performed, you would know that the fetus reaching out and touching/grabbing the surgeon’s finger would be fucking impossible.

Do you think the mother of that fetus was awake during this surgery? NO.

She was put under anesthesia. Guess what happens when you put something in a pregnant person…IT ALSO GOES TO THE FETUS.

That’s why drinking alcohol or eating soft cheese or sushi is such a “no-no” for pregnant people. 

So, the mother was put under anesthesia and couldn’t move…HER FETUS COULDN’T EITHER. That is how pregnancy and anesthesia work.

Don’t take my word for it, though, take the actual surgeon’s:

The baby did not reach out. The baby was anesthetized. It was not aware of what was going on.

The surgeon never said that it was an emotional experience for him, the pro-life photographer who took said it. The surgeon pulled the hand out himself, as the fetus was fucking paralyzed at the time.

Here, I did your research for you:

Source #1 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Source #2 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Source #3 regarding the inaccuracy of this photo.

Finding those took me, like, four minutes of Googling and skimming.

Love,

Rabble

Reblogged: stankdank

8 August 11

Abortion<Pro Life

stfuconservatives:

propaganda-for-life:

infullcolor:

PEOPLE WHO THINK ABORTION IS BIRTH CONTROL OR A WAY TO JUST LIVE YOUR LIFE AND GET RID OF A RESPONSIBILITY NEED TO KNOW THERE FACTS

PRO CHOICE IS THE DUMBEST THING I HAVE EVER HEARD OF!

PRO CHOICE PEOPLE SHOULD WEAR A SIGN THAT SAYS I THINK ITS OKAY TO RIP APART A BABY LIMB BY LIMB AS IT SCREAMS AND THE RIP ITS TORSO FROM ITS HEAD DECAPITATING IT AND CRUSH ITS HEAD AND SKULL AND SUCK OUT  THE DEA BABY SOUP WITH A VACUME!

BECAUSE THATS WHAT THEY DO IN AN ABORTION! FUCKING MORONS!

FYI. MOST PRO CHIOCE PEOPLE THINK ABORTION IS A ONE STEP PAINLESS THING LIKE TAKE A PILL ITS DONE OR THEY ARE UNAWEAR OF HOW CURL AND MORBID IT IS.

THEY ARE ALSO PEOPLE WHO ARE UNAWEAR THAT A 12 WEEK UNBORN CHILD CAN FEEL HAS INSTINCS AND A HEART BEAT THAT BEATS FASTER WHEN IS SCARED AND WHEN IT THREATED. THAT IT HAS A BRAIN NAILS AND FEELS LOVE FOR THE MOTHER THEY ARE ATTACHED TOO.

PRO LIFE AND PRO LIVE!  ADOPTION!

[Image: a brunette girl in a pink school uniform drawn in anime style. She is sitting on a bench and nonchalantly holding a drink in one hand. Text reads in all caps, “LET ME TELL YOU WHY THAT’S BULLSHIT.” End description.]

  • Abortion involves no babies. They are fetuses and embryos which cannot even feel pain until 24 weeks. At 21 weeks, the vast majority of the very few abortions which occur are for some kind of medical emergency only. So no, abortion doesn’t kill or even torture any babies.
  • The whole “tearing the fetus apart” thing doesn’t occur in many abortions. In fact, most abortions happen before nine weeks’ gestation (link), at which point the blastocyst looks something more like this (link). Shapeless blobs of tissue—seriously. And you’re saying that has more rights than the person carrying it.

Oh hey, just a side note, even though caps lock is cruise control for cool, you still have to steer.

-sanityscraps

Hey, pro-lifers, ^^this is why we can’t take you seriously.

Pro-life people should wear a shirt that says, “I don’t care about people with uteruses! I would rather they die of a horrible infection or become sterilized or fucking die than possibly let them have control of their own bodies! It’s been proven that abortion rates don’t go down where abortion is illegal, but I’m still pro-maiming-women!”

Anti-choicers…step into my office.

Posts like the original are why you can’t have nice things. Posts like the original make a laughing stock of your movement by removing all credibility. Posts like the original show how little you know about abortions, who gets them, why, and what kinds of abortions are performed.

Also:

FYI. MOST PRO CHIOCE PEOPLE THINK ABORTION IS A ONE STEP PAINLESS THING LIKE TAKE A PILL ITS DONE OR THEY ARE UNAWEAR OF HOW CURL AND MORBID IT IS.

I read that as Underwear, first, and then I saw “curl” and just fucking lost it.

If you don’t know how to spell vacuum, maybe you shouldn’t try to describe what a suction aspiration abortion is like. Especially since there aren’t really defined limbs to rip apart and make into “DEA BABY SOUP”. Also, a 6-12 week fetus (like those a suction aspiration abortion would be used for) can’t fucking scream.

….

I think we all learned a valuable lesson tonight. 

Like how to spell vacuum correctly.

Love,

Rabble

(Source: soundofteeth)

Reblogged: stfuconservatives

Themed by Hunson. Originally by Josh